Pioneering thought — Sladen Legal

Alicia Hill

ASIC -v- PayPal: How it assists understanding what constitutes an Unfair Contract Term

ASIC -v- PayPal: How it assists understanding what constitutes an Unfair Contract Term

The Federal Court decision of ASIC v PayPal Australia Pty Limited [2024] FCA 762 further clarifies the statutory unfair contract terms regime with respect to standard form contracts and provides another example of ASIC successfully taking action to void an unfair contract term.

Businesses using standard form contracts should review their contracts for potentially unfair contract terms considering recent legislative and common law changes.

#unfaircontractterms #unfair #contract #standardform #ASIC

Unfair Contract Terms What we can learn from the decided cases

Unfair Contract Terms What we can learn from the decided cases

This paper tracks the legislative development of the unfair contract terms regime, recaps the basic elements and exemptions to the regime’s application and then recounts the historic development of the case law in respect of the regime.

Pursuing directors for insolvent trading: Can a creditor take action?

Pursuing directors for insolvent trading: Can a creditor take action?

In certain circumstances creditors can take direct action against directors of companies in liquidation  to recover insolvent trading losses suffered.

The process for doing so is to first try and obtain the liquidator’s consent and if they are not forthcoming, then take the steps required under subsections 588S and 588T of the Act.

Contempt of Court – Lessons from Ultratune’s $1.5 million fine for contempt

Contempt of Court – Lessons from Ultratune’s $1.5 million fine for contempt

In an previous article discussing the ACCC’s enforcement priorities for 2024-25, we noted that the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has continued to monitor strict compliance with small business codes of conduct, including the Franchising Code of Conduct (Franchising Code).

 

In particular, the ACCC had pursued UltraTune, for contempt of Court when Ultratune failed to comply with orders made by the court requiring Ultratune to take specific actions. On 28 January 2025, UltraTune’s appeal was dismissed by the Full Federal Court.

 

UltraTune’s story serves as an important reminder to ensure active monitoring of business’ compliance with all the obligations including those imposed on them by the law or court order and those that they might voluntarily agree to undertake.

Admitting debts to qualify creditors for interest: requirements on liquidators under section 563B of the Corporations Act.

Admitting debts to qualify creditors for interest: requirements on liquidators under section 563B of the Corporations Act.

In the decision of Park, Re Queensland Nickel Pty Ltd (in liq) (Statutory Interest)[1], Justice Downes held that liquidators must make a ‘conscious’ effort to determine who may be entitled to a company’s assets for debts to qualify for interest under section 563B of the Corporations Act 2001(Cth) (Act). [1] [2024] FCA 1300

Navigating a Restructure Under the Corporations Act: Protection Against Contractual Rights to Help Your Business Get Back on Track

Navigating a Restructure Under the Corporations Act: Protection Against Contractual Rights to Help Your Business Get Back on Track

If your business is restructuring, contractual rights triggered solely by the restructure or financial distress may be rendered unenforceable under section 454N of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). This statutory protection can help a business stabilise and continue trading through difficult times. This article reviews a recent case of Okami SA Newton Pty Ltd v Newton SC Pty Ltd which considered the operation of this section.

New ASIC Guidance on Insolvent Trading

New ASIC Guidance on Insolvent Trading

On 6 December 2024, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) updated its Regulatory Guide: Duty to prevent insolvent trading: Guide for directors (RG 217).

The guide contains key principles intended to help directors comply with their duty to prevent insolvent trading and how to establish safe harbour protection through proactive monitoring and timely action.

Franchising Update: A Year in Review

Franchising Update: A Year in Review

This article will looks back on some of the key developments that occurred in the franchising sector in 2024, offering a reminder of changes and developments that occurred and foreshadowing what franchise businesses can expect in this coming year.

Franchising Update: Key Changes to the Franchising Code for 2025

Franchising Update: Key Changes to the Franchising Code for 2025

If you are a franchisor or a franchisee, it is important to be updated on the upcoming changes to the franchising Code of Conduct. The new Code contains a number of changes which will significantly increase the compliance burden and risk for the franchisors. The new Code is set to commence on 1 April 2025, franchisors may need to redraft the franchise agreements before that date to avoid penalties.

Sladen Snippet - Proposed General and Specific Prohibitions On Unfair Trading Practices – Chance To Submit Your Views

Sladen Snippet - Proposed General and Specific Prohibitions On Unfair Trading Practices – Chance To Submit Your Views

On 15 November 2024, the Treasury release a consultation paper on the design of proposed general and specific prohibitions on unfair trading practices. Options to amend the Australian Consumer Law will be considered and agreed in consultation with States and Territories.

Senior Management liability for the conduct of a company business: Lessons from Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v ACCC

Senior Management liability for the conduct of a company business: Lessons from Productivity Partners Pty Ltd v ACCC

The High Court deemed a tertiary college’s enrolment processes to be unconscionable for creating a risk of unsuitable student enrolment and found that  senior management may be held liable as accessories for the actions of the business if they were aware of the primary matters which made the conduct unreasonable. 

Sladen Snippet - Proposed Licensing Regime for the Franchising Sector – chance to submit views

Sladen Snippet - Proposed Licensing Regime for the Franchising Sector – chance to submit views

In November 2024, the Government introduced a consultation paper proposing the incorporation of a licensing regime for the franchising sector.

Can you Mislead or Deceive Someone if You Have Honestly Relied on Your Lawyers Advice? A Case Study on ASIC v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd

Can you Mislead or Deceive Someone if You Have Honestly Relied on Your Lawyers Advice? A Case Study on ASIC v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd

The Federal Court of Australia’s judgment in ASIC v Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd highlights that if a corporation honestly relies on advice from their lawyers that may provide reasonable grounds to defend the making of a representation that concerns the present state of affairs.

The Federal Court found that representations made by Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd (REST) regarding their rules and practice were opinions expressed as to the law based on reasonable grounds due to reliance on advice received from their lawyers and other trusted sources. Therefore, the representations made could not amount to misleading or deceptive conduct.

Why it is important to have disclaimers: a lesson learned from Mallonland Pty Ltd v Advanta Seeds Pty Ltd

Why it is important to have disclaimers:  a lesson learned from Mallonland Pty Ltd v Advanta Seeds Pty Ltd

The High Court of Australia’s judgment in Mallonland Pty Ltd & Anor v Advanta Seeds Pty Ltd [2024] HCA 25 emphasised the significance of incorporating clearly written disclaimers on your product’s packaging to limit your liability for pure economic loss claims in negligence.

The Importance of Clear and Formal Documentation by Companies: Lessons from Aurora Australasia Pty Ltd v Hunt Prosperity Pty Ltd

The Importance of Clear and Formal Documentation by Companies: Lessons from Aurora Australasia Pty Ltd v Hunt Prosperity Pty Ltd

A company director’s request to redeem money from a unit trust has been rejected by the Court. The New South Wales Supreme Court ruling emphasises the need for clear documentation of intended transactions within a company structure.

Sladen Snippet - Consultation process Franchising code of conduct review

Sladen Snippet - Consultation process Franchising code of conduct review

The Australian government has proposed reforms to the Competition and Consumer Act in response to the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct and Franchising Code of Conduct reviews. The consultation process closes on 4 October 2024 and welcomes submissions from interested stakeholders.

Winding up process and considerations for creditors following an unsatisfied statutory demand

Winding up process and considerations for creditors following an unsatisfied statutory demand

The most common basis upon which creditors make an application to wind up a company and appoint liquidators is upon the non-compliance with a Creditor’s Statutory Demand. If the debtor company ignores the Creditor’s Statutory Demand and no payment or compromise is reached then the company is presumed insolvent, paving the way to wind up the company.

This article contains an explanation of the steps required when lodging an application for winding up in these circumstances, as well as some helpful tips to navigate the process effectively.