The Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision in MD Commercial Pty Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue [2019] VSCA 295 was a culmination of the battle between the Victorian Commissioner of State Revenue and the taxpayers’ statutory interpretation of a duty exemption contained in s 35 of the Duties Act 2000 (Vic) (Act) and whether the trustee had to be in a “bare trustee” relationship with no active powers being held by the trustee.
Interpreting and Varying Trust Deeds
Trusts and the franking credits trap: can we fix it?
Navigating the trust loss provisions maze
Duty exemptions for Victorian trusts
Insurance-backed buy-sell agreements
The Appointor: Common Problems
Reg 13.22C unit trusts – opportunity or burden?
TD 2019/D6 and TD 2019/D7: (further) unintended consequences?
Residency of a trust: don’t get it wrong
Preliminary ATO views on trust splitting
Trustee duties in the time of bitcoin
Trusts and two-tiered company tax rates
Trusts, income tax, CGT and foreign residents
The nature of the trustee’s right of indemnity
Death Benefit Planning in the New Superannuation Environment
Testamentary trust will structuring
Trusts, Income Tax, CGT And Foreign Residents
The rules for the taxation of trusts are complex and in need of reform. A point that has been made many times since Hill J observed in Davis v FCT1 that “the scheme of Division 6 calls out for legislative clarification, especially since the insertion into the Act of provisions taxing capital gains as assessable income”.